
Now, I know normally Dave comes up with something all his own, but Sci-Fi Scanner got me thinking. Just how would you market and shape a film like Wonder Woman, one of DC Comics’ top three characters? After the huge success Christopher Nolan had with Batman, and ignoring the gigantic flop that was Superman Returns, there’s a possible gold mine with this Amazon.
Sure, S-FS is earnest and truly try to decide how to make a good film (”Skip the Origin Story,” “Check Out the New Comics”) but since when does that mean jack when your heroine runs out in a onesie with a magic S&M lasso? No, when it comes to Wonder Woman, we run into two very basic problems.
a) Strong female lead who is comfortable wearing a onesie for 90-120 min.
b)Someone who can make a) not suck.
So how does one even accomplish this feat, when not even Joss Whedon could bring a proper sheen to the franchise through no fault of his own? It’s almost impossible, as the female character in the past summer blockbusters were either a one-dimensional damsel (Katie Holmes/Rachel Gylenhaal/Gwyneth Paltrow), a buxom one-dimensional “ass-kicker” (Jessica Biel, Selma Blair) or they were the by-product of a horrible 80s film (Helen Slater, Lea Thompson.)
God forbid I even bring up Halle Berry.
What we get down to is indeed sexism and even a sense of childishness that can be blamed on the filmmakers and the comic’s creators. Alysa Rosenberg at The American Prospect was right when she wrote:
At their best, a few superheroines transcend their paneled pages and become literary figures. But rather than drawing on extant rich stories about female superheroes, contemporary comic-based movies either downplay their powers and their personalities or rewrite them as trashy high camp.
In Fantastic Four lore, Susan Storm is a relative genius that has to live in the shadow of Reed Richards. Even her power is primarily to turn invisible, whereas Reed extends himself and becomes smarter in the process. I won’t get boiled down in gender theory, but there’s clearly something going on. No wonder in the film Jessica Alba was cast to act as a pair of breasts in a skin-tight suit. So, how exactly do we pitch Wonder Woman? Do we modernize it? Do we make it as campy as the TV show? Maybe go the route of a “tween” Diana and cast a Disney-friendly face?
Well, we don’t do anything. Because the film shouldn’t be made.
If anything, Warner Brothers would endorse a Catwoman-esque retooling to give the false impression of feminism that does nothing more than tout the joys of being an Amazon. There’d be a Lynda Carter cameo, vague double entendres about lassoing men and the whole “fish out of water” storyline that comes when your main character was molded from clay or a princess or whatever retcon is canon these days. And as it stands right now, WB would be afraid to touch the film given its’ past with Whedon. At best, Wonder Woman will be a side-character in whatever form the bastardized Justice League takes.
Our advice? Take the money and use it to design a decent female comic character for a film that wouldn’t suck.
Read more...










